COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF NEUROLOGICAL DISEASE by Janice Keramedjian (19726261)

“…One approach to increasing the CNS penetration of MMF is to utilize a carrier molecule that utilizes active transport proteins, such as glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), sodium vitamin C transporter 2 (SVCT2) (Nualart, Mack et al. 2014) or large neutral amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) (Singh and Ecker 2018). …”

<b>Exploring left lateral decubitus position, and its influence on infant mortality in pregnant women in their third trimester, brought to the emergency through the GVK Ambulance S... by Laggy George (19873020)

“…</p><p dir="ltr">Conclusion:</p><p dir="ltr">Transporting mothers in a Left Lateral Decubitus position may significantly decrease the odds of Infant mortality by 62%; after adjusting for antenatal care visits. …”

Baseline firing rate: locomotion speed control and the effect of behavioral context on negative preferring neurons. by Yun Wen Chu (20968520)

“…(<b>E</b>) Bar graph of the percent of neurons that significantly increase, decrease, or do not change during the Miss or Away condition. …”

Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Elasticity of black-white male disparity in X. by David McMillon (546087)

“…We examine how marginal increases in flows between states interact to decrease or increase the long-run level of crime, and whether this varies by subgroup. …”

by Subgroup. by David McMillon (546087)

“…We examine how marginal increases in flows between states interact to decrease or increase the long-run level of crime, and whether this varies by subgroup. …”

by Subgroup. by David McMillon (546087)

“…We examine how marginal increases in flows between states interact to decrease or increase the long-run level of crime, and whether this varies by subgroup. …”

by Subgroup. by David McMillon (546087)

“…We examine how marginal increases in flows between states interact to decrease or increase the long-run level of crime, and whether this varies by subgroup. …”

by Subgroup. by David McMillon (546087)

“…We examine how marginal increases in flows between states interact to decrease or increase the long-run level of crime, and whether this varies by subgroup. …”

by Subgroup. by David McMillon (546087)

“…We examine how marginal increases in flows between states interact to decrease or increase the long-run level of crime, and whether this varies by subgroup. …”

by subgroup. by David McMillon (546087)

“…We examine how marginal increases in flows between states interact to decrease or increase the long-run level of crime, and whether this varies by subgroup. …”

Transitions away from crime and arrest. by David McMillon (546087)

“…We examine how marginal increases in flows between states interact to decrease or increase the long-run level of crime, and whether this varies by subgroup. …”