Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
inter decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
inter decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
1901
-
1902
Innovative Self-Powered Electrically Stimulated Fabric Dressing for Enhanced Diabetic Wound Healing
Published 2025“…These enhancements contributed to faster wound closure, decreased inflammatory response, increased collagen deposition, and improved angiogenesis. …”
-
1903
-
1904
-
1905
Flow chart of the literature search.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1906
Funnel plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1907
Network plot for VSS score.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1908
Network plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1909
Funnel plot for VSS score.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1910
Characteristics of the included trials (n = 17).
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1911
Risk of bias graph.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1912
Network plot for VAS score.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1913
Funnel plot for VAS score.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1914
-
1915
Ecological and Health Risk Mediated by Micro(nano)plastics Aging Process: Perspectives and Challenges
Published 2025“…The changes in the physical and chemical characteristics of aged MNPs significantly influence their environmental behavior by releasing additives, forming byproducts, and adsorbing contaminants. …”
-
1916
Ecological and Health Risk Mediated by Micro(nano)plastics Aging Process: Perspectives and Challenges
Published 2025“…The changes in the physical and chemical characteristics of aged MNPs significantly influence their environmental behavior by releasing additives, forming byproducts, and adsorbing contaminants. …”
-
1917
-
1918
-
1919
-
1920