Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
521
-
522
-
523
-
524
-
525
-
526
Summary of significance levels for comparison of surgical segment ROM between different test groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
527
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
528
-
529
-
530
Abutment shoulder adhesive filling rate (AFR) of silicone rubber calculated by ImageJ.
Published 2025Subjects: -
531
-
532
Retention strength testing of the cemented crown by universal testing machine.
Published 2025Subjects: -
533
(A) Auxiliary marking points to ensure complete and accurate seating of the prosthesis.
Published 2025Subjects: -
534
Data of Cement retention force(N) for each group in retention strength test.
Published 2025Subjects: -
535
-
536
-
537
-
538
Photograph of the implant prostheses with different hole opening strategies.
Published 2025Subjects: -
539
-
540