Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
541
-
542
Summary of significance levels for comparison of surgical segment ROM between different test groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
543
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
544
-
545
-
546
Abutment shoulder adhesive filling rate (AFR) of silicone rubber calculated by ImageJ.
Published 2025Subjects: -
547
-
548
Retention strength testing of the cemented crown by universal testing machine.
Published 2025Subjects: -
549
(A) Auxiliary marking points to ensure complete and accurate seating of the prosthesis.
Published 2025Subjects: -
550
Data of Cement retention force(N) for each group in retention strength test.
Published 2025Subjects: -
551
-
552
-
553
-
554
Photograph of the implant prostheses with different hole opening strategies.
Published 2025Subjects: -
555
-
556
-
557
Results of adhesive filling rate (AFR) at abutment shoulder filling rate in each group.
Published 2025Subjects: -
558
-
559
Cement retention force values(N) for each group in the cement retention strength test.
Published 2025Subjects: -
560