يعرض 221 - 240 نتائج من 1,423 نتيجة بحث عن '(( significant ((larger decrease) OR (largest decrease)) ) OR ( significant gap decrease ))', وقت الاستعلام: 0.46s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 221
  2. 222
  3. 223
  4. 224
  5. 225
  6. 226
  7. 227
  8. 228
  9. 229
  10. 230

    Supporting information. حسب Jianqin Ma (20328414)

    منشور في 2025
    الموضوعات:
  11. 231
  12. 232
  13. 233
  14. 234

    Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    منشور في 2025
    "…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
  15. 235

    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    منشور في 2025
    "…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
  16. 236

    Sample attribute table. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    منشور في 2025
    "…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
  17. 237

    Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    منشور في 2025
    "…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
  18. 238

    Sample scenario description. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    منشور في 2025
    "…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
  19. 239

    AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    منشور في 2025
    "…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
  20. 240

    Methodological flowchart. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    منشور في 2025
    "…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"