بدائل البحث:
largest decrease » marked decrease (توسيع البحث)
larger decrease » marked decrease (توسيع البحث)
gap decrease » a decrease (توسيع البحث), gain decreased (توسيع البحث), mean decrease (توسيع البحث)
largest decrease » marked decrease (توسيع البحث)
larger decrease » marked decrease (توسيع البحث)
gap decrease » a decrease (توسيع البحث), gain decreased (توسيع البحث), mean decrease (توسيع البحث)
-
221
Intraoperative facial and intraoral photographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction.
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
222
-
223
-
224
-
225
Characteristics of water footprint by sector at the regional level in China.
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
226
The distribution of water footprint levels in China. a, 2005. b, 2010. c, 2015. d, 2022.
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
227
-
228
Synergy and trade-offs of sectoral water use at the regional level in China.
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
229
Decoupling index of water footprint and GDP at the regional level in China.
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
230
-
231
-
232
Second-order partial correlation analysis of sectoral water use in China from 2005 to 2022.
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
233
-
234
Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
235
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
236
Sample attribute table.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
237
Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
238
Sample scenario description.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
239
AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
240
Methodological flowchart.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"