Search alternatives:
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
interaction term » interaction _ (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
interaction term » interaction _ (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
141
-
142
-
143
Loci with significant interaction between fish oil supplementation and blood lipid levels.
Published 2021“…Effect, beta coefficient of the minor allele dose term (β<sub>G</sub> in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009431#pgen.1009431.e004" target="_blank">Eq (1)</a>); MAF, minor allele frequency; SE, standard error; Int effect, beta coefficient of the interaction term (β<sub>G×E</sub>G×E in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009431#pgen.1009431.e004" target="_blank">Eq (1)</a>). …”
-
144
-
145
-
146
-
147
-
148
Adversely interacting drug pairs and non-interacting drug pairs significantly differ with regard to the 11 features selected.
Published 2019“…(f) Minimum and maximum genetic interaction score between targets of two drugs. Statistical significance was determined by the two-sided permutation test on the sample mean. …”
-
149
-
150
The impact of the computerization and age-appreciation or age-depreciation on employment.
Published 2022Subjects: -
151
-
152
-
153
-
154
-
155
-
156
-
157
-
158
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
159
-
160