Search alternatives:
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
larger increases » large increases (Expand Search), marked increases (Expand Search), largest decreases (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
larger increases » large increases (Expand Search), marked increases (Expand Search), largest decreases (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
2
-
3
-
4
DataSheet_2_Climate factors drive plant distributions at higher taxonomic scales and larger spatial scales.docx
Published 2024“…Edaphic factors congruously decreased their importance on plant distributions as spatial and taxonomic scales increased. …”
-
5
DataSheet_3_Climate factors drive plant distributions at higher taxonomic scales and larger spatial scales.docx
Published 2024“…Edaphic factors congruously decreased their importance on plant distributions as spatial and taxonomic scales increased. …”
-
6
DataSheet_1_Climate factors drive plant distributions at higher taxonomic scales and larger spatial scales.docx
Published 2024“…Edaphic factors congruously decreased their importance on plant distributions as spatial and taxonomic scales increased. …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
Spatial information of excitatory neurons in APP/PS1 mice are decreased in dCA1 and vCA1.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.134 ± 0.050, shuffled = 0.123 ± 0.035, p < 0.005, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 229 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 22900 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.054, shuffled = 0.124 ± .054, p = 0.13, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 124 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 12400 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Current nest box designs may not be optimal for the larger forest dormice; pre-hibernation increase in body mass might lead to sampling bias in ecological data
Published 2021“…Additionally, nest box occupancy decreased significantly from 20% before to 4.6% after the gnawing behavior.…”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
Structure stabilizes larger numbers of species, but increasing competitive asymmetry increases species loss.
Published 2021“…<b>(B)</b> Comparing identical conditions between two different system sizes (<i>L</i> = 100 and <i>L</i> = 200), the effects of disorder are relatively small in comparison to the effects of system size, with smaller system sizes (blue lines) showing a significant amplification of reduction in survival probability as compared to the larger system. …”
-
20