Search alternatives:
significant connection » significant correlation (Expand Search), significant correlations (Expand Search), significant contribution (Expand Search)
connection phases » infection phases (Expand Search), consecutive phases (Expand Search), contraction phase (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant connection » significant correlation (Expand Search), significant correlations (Expand Search), significant contribution (Expand Search)
connection phases » infection phases (Expand Search), consecutive phases (Expand Search), contraction phase (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
-
63
-
64
-
65
-
66
-
67
-
68
-
69
Interareal CFS and PAC decrease as a function of distance.
Published 2020“…<p>(a) Connection density (<i>K</i>) for uncorrected (left) and corrected (right) interareal CFS estimated separately in 3 distance bins containing equal numbers of connections for 1:2 (top row) and 1:3 (bottom row) interareal CFS in SEEG data. …”
-
70
-
71
-
72
Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ.
Published 2024“…The findings suggest that when λ is respectively equal to 4.19, 8.57, 10, and 12.15, the peak particle velocity (PPV) of the transmitted waves is significantly close to the incident wave amplitude. Furthermore, when λ is fixed, the energy transmission coefficient increases with the incident wave amplitude but decreases with the incident wave frequency. …”
-
73
Gallbladder fossa parameters in livers with gallbladders, segregated by sex.
Published 2021Subjects: -
74
-
75
-
76
-
77
-
78
Comparison of gallbladder fossa parameters in livers from cadavers with and without gallbladders.
Published 2021Subjects: -
79
-
80