Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 7,421 - 7,440 results of 21,342 for search '(( significant ((largest decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ) OR ( significant decrease decrease ))', query time: 0.76s Refine Results
  1. 7421
  2. 7422
  3. 7423
  4. 7424
  5. 7425
  6. 7426
  7. 7427

    Fig 3 - by Rima Moghnieh (679199)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
  8. 7428
  9. 7429
  10. 7430
  11. 7431
  12. 7432
  13. 7433
  14. 7434
  15. 7435

    Experimental design of this study. by Renya Kawakami (20469088)

    Published 2024
    “…In fact, naive old males exhibited significantly higher paternity success compared with old males who had previously mated. …”
  16. 7436

    All relevant data of this study. by Renya Kawakami (20469088)

    Published 2024
    “…In fact, naive old males exhibited significantly higher paternity success compared with old males who had previously mated. …”
  17. 7437

    Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  18. 7438

    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  19. 7439

    Baseline characteristics. by Seung Min Lee (1644409)

    Published 2025
    “…The distance of the FD decreased (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and FVs increased (<i>P</i> < 0.001, both). …”
  20. 7440

    Sample attribute table. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”