Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 8,961 - 8,980 results of 21,342 for search '(( significant ((largest decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ) OR ( significant decrease decrease ))', query time: 0.63s Refine Results
  1. 8961

    Multiscale QM/MM Simulations Identify the Roles of Asp239 and 1‑OH···Nucleophile in Transition State Stabilization in Arabidopsis thaliana Cell-Wall Invertase 1 by Wijitra Jitonnom (22410515)

    Published 2025
    “…Here, quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) free-energy simulations were carried out to clarify the origin of the observed decreased rates in Asp239Ala, Asp239Asn, and Asp239Phe in AtCWIN1 compared to the wild type and delineate the role of Asp239 in catalysis. …”
  2. 8962

    Effect of ibuprofen (IBU) on HIF-1α transcriptional activity and protein level. by Katarina Grossmannova (7543517)

    Published 2025
    “…(D) Detection of HIF-1 target proteins PDHK1 and LDHA in HCT116 and FaDu cells treated with IBU in hypoxia revealed decreased levels of all proteins under 1 mM IBU treatment. …”
  3. 8963

    FK506 significantly potentiates caspofungin activity against tolerant <i>C. tropicalis</i> strains, reversing tolerance phenotypes in both <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> models... by Yongqin Wu (272012)

    Published 2025
    “…(F) FK506 substantially decreases the fungal load in <i>G. mellonella</i> larvae infected with tolerant strains and treated with caspofungin. …”
  4. 8964

    Community consumption of J01 antibiotics at national and state levels expressed as DDD per 1000 inhabitants and per day (DID), Brazil, 2014−2020. by Tatiana de Jesus Nascimento Ferreira (21492903)

    Published 2025
    “…<sup>3</sup>Trend- indicates that the change in consumption (↑ increase or ↓ decrease) was statistically significant (p-value ≤ 0.05%). …”
  5. 8965
  6. 8966
  7. 8967
  8. 8968
  9. 8969
  10. 8970
  11. 8971
  12. 8972

    Flow chart of the literature search. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  13. 8973
  14. 8974

    Funnel plot for scar thickness. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  15. 8975

    Network plot for VSS score. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  16. 8976

    Network plot for scar thickness. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  17. 8977

    Funnel plot for VSS score. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  18. 8978

    Characteristics of the included trials (n = 17). by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  19. 8979

    Risk of bias graph. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  20. 8980

    Network plot for VAS score. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”