Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
8961
Multiscale QM/MM Simulations Identify the Roles of Asp239 and 1‑OH···Nucleophile in Transition State Stabilization in Arabidopsis thaliana Cell-Wall Invertase 1
Published 2025“…Here, quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) free-energy simulations were carried out to clarify the origin of the observed decreased rates in Asp239Ala, Asp239Asn, and Asp239Phe in AtCWIN1 compared to the wild type and delineate the role of Asp239 in catalysis. …”
-
8962
Effect of ibuprofen (IBU) on HIF-1α transcriptional activity and protein level.
Published 2025“…(D) Detection of HIF-1 target proteins PDHK1 and LDHA in HCT116 and FaDu cells treated with IBU in hypoxia revealed decreased levels of all proteins under 1 mM IBU treatment. …”
-
8963
FK506 significantly potentiates caspofungin activity against tolerant <i>C. tropicalis</i> strains, reversing tolerance phenotypes in both <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> models...
Published 2025“…(F) FK506 substantially decreases the fungal load in <i>G. mellonella</i> larvae infected with tolerant strains and treated with caspofungin. …”
-
8964
Community consumption of J01 antibiotics at national and state levels expressed as DDD per 1000 inhabitants and per day (DID), Brazil, 2014−2020.
Published 2025“…<sup>3</sup>Trend- indicates that the change in consumption (↑ increase or ↓ decrease) was statistically significant (p-value ≤ 0.05%). …”
-
8965
-
8966
Community consumption of systemic antibiotics, according to Therapeutic Subgroup ATC 3<sup>rd</sup> level, expressed as DDD per 1000 inhabitants and per day (DID) and relative cons...
Published 2025“…<sup>3</sup> Indicates ↑ increase or ↓ decrease in consumption statistically significant (p-value ≤ 0.05%). …”
-
8967
-
8968
-
8969
-
8970
-
8971
-
8972
Flow chart of the literature search.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
8973
-
8974
Funnel plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
8975
Network plot for VSS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
8976
Network plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
8977
Funnel plot for VSS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
8978
Characteristics of the included trials (n = 17).
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
8979
Risk of bias graph.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
8980
Network plot for VAS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”