Phase 2 significant effects. by Wendy C. Crone (2262169)

“…<p>Graphical representations of eight significant effects observed between pre- and post-test means for intervention and control groups. …”

Phase 1 significant effects. by Wendy C. Crone (2262169)

“…<p>Graphical representations of significant effects observed between pre- and post-test means in four measures for intervention and control groups. …”

Examination of the effect of treatment groups, different times and the effect of group* time, for VAS and REEDA indicators. by Masoumeh Sayahi (17468290)

Subjects:

MS decreases the larger amplitude distribution in adult rats. by Jesús David Ayala-Rodríguez (17364296)

A noxious temperature decrease without a prior increase produces a subtly larger decrease in pain intensity. by Benedict J. Alter (9745466)

“…Although a 2-way RM ANOVA with matching by stimulus and time showed main effects of time and stimulus, there was no statistically significant difference at any timepoint during the t3 interval. …”

Sensitivity analyses of seroprevalence with the largest sample size study omitted. by Yu Zhou (89766)

Subjects:

Single-leg stance center of pressure velocity. by Evangelia-Regkina Symeonidou (16378663)

Subjects:

Matrix crosslinking decreases cell migration persistence. by Michael Pamonag (12295175)

Averaged contrast sensitivity parameter data (Mean and SD) for the MC and PC pathways by age group. by Xiaohua Zhuang (11890694)

Subjects:

Comparison of treatment effects between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Subjects:

Correlations of cytokines that significantly change between the pre-infusion and post-infusion blood draws pearson’s correlation between cytokine pairs is indicated by color and si... by Jordan K. Abbott (8934239)

Subjects:

Comparison of upper and lower arch crowding between premolar extraction group and the mandibular third molar extraction groups. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Subjects:

Larger example of stimuli with cue relevant for Task 3. by Marcel F. Hinss (14675457)

Long COVID prevalence decreases with vaccine uptake in the U.S. by Manlio De Domenico (626037)

“…<p>(A) Prevalence in U.S. states and the U.S. exhibits a decreasing trend with respect to vaccine uptake, both in the population vaccinated with at least one dose (top) and two doses (bottom), with the largest gap between 100% vaccinated and 100% unvaccinated scenarios observed in the reference population of adults who had COVID-19. …”

Resume of significant effects. by Jerome Flores (10169353)

Points represent regions where the cluster coefficient was significantly larger in HC compared to MCI, at sparsity level of 0.15. by Therese M. Gilligan (7460906)

Demographic information of focus group participants. by Katie J. Shillington (16557695)

Subjects:

Decrease of injuries. by Petr Fulin (8380320)

Subjects:

Example of predicted effects of choice bundling on preference for larger, later rewards (LLRs) over smaller, sooner rewards (SSRs). by Jeffrey S. Stein (11689918)

Between-group differences in 95% Area, Y Sway Amplitude and LFS during postural training. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects: