Search alternatives:
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
interaction groups » intervention groups (Expand Search), interaction graph (Expand Search), intervention group (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 41 - 60 results of 21,957 for search '(( significant ((largest decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ) OR ( significant interaction groups ))', query time: 0.83s Refine Results
  1. 41
    Subgroup models following significant interaction between tobacco use and sex.

    Subgroup models following significant interaction between tobacco use and sex. by Shakila Meshkat (12360623)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 42
    Significant relationships between QOL measures on infusion day and day 7.

    Significant relationships between QOL measures on infusion day and day 7. by Jordan K. Abbott (8934239)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 43
    Metabolome features cluster most significantly according to patient covariate groups.

    Metabolome features cluster most significantly according to patient covariate groups. by Nicholas A. Bokulich (10145999)

    Published 2022
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 44
    Phase 2 significant effects.

    Phase 2 significant effects. by Wendy C. Crone (2262169)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 45
    Phase 1 significant effects.

    Phase 1 significant effects. by Wendy C. Crone (2262169)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 46
    The mean score of the pretest between the experimental group and control group for older adults.

    The mean score of the pretest between the experimental group and control group for older adults. by Siti Noraini Asmuri (18297722)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 47
    Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) Examining Group, Position, and Group × Position Interaction Effects on Outcome Variables.

    Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) Examining Group, Position, and Group × Position Interaction Effects on Outcome Variables. by Ramita Gupta (21512558)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 48
    Interaction between the percentage of language switching and Language group.

    Interaction between the percentage of language switching and Language group. by Camilla Masullo (18065004)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 49
    Interaction between Acceptability Judgment and Language group on RTs.

    Interaction between Acceptability Judgment and Language group on RTs. by Camilla Masullo (18065004)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 50
    The least significant differences (LSD) to compare means of activated samples with control group.

    The least significant differences (LSD) to compare means of activated samples with control group. by Lubna Rahman (14265988)

    Published 2022
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 51
    fMRI results for anatomical regions, seed voxel coordinates (MNI), and F-values for significant stimulus-by-group interactions.

    fMRI results for anatomical regions, seed voxel coordinates (MNI), and F-values for significant stimulus-by-group interactions. by Shou Fukushima (9137469)

    Published 2020
    “…<p>fMRI results for anatomical regions, seed voxel coordinates (MNI), and F-values for significant stimulus-by-group interactions.</p>…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 52
    Post-hoc comparisons of significant main effects and interactions for participant groups and time points on semantic differential profile scores.

    Post-hoc comparisons of significant main effects and interactions for participant groups and time points on semantic differential profile scores. by Melissa Tan (4045742)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 53
    White matter tracts that showed a significant interaction of accuracy in the loss avoidance incentive with fractional anisotropy between groups.

    White matter tracts that showed a significant interaction of accuracy in the loss avoidance incentive with fractional anisotropy between groups. by Sussanne Reyes (8921669)

    Published 2020
    “…<p>White matter tracts that showed a significant interaction of accuracy in the loss avoidance incentive with fractional anisotropy between groups.…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 54
    Summary statistics for the 2-Digit SOC2010 occupation groups.

    Summary statistics for the 2-Digit SOC2010 occupation groups. by Piyachart Phiromswad (10090295)

    Published 2022
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 55
    A significant interaction of FC among cerebellar sub-regions and cerebral cortexes.

    A significant interaction of FC among cerebellar sub-regions and cerebral cortexes. by Mengling Shao (7450343)

    Published 2019
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 56
    Box plots showing interactions for the NH listener group.

    Box plots showing interactions for the NH listener group. by James M. Kates (10723950)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 57
    Box plots showing interactions for the HI listener group.

    Box plots showing interactions for the HI listener group. by James M. Kates (10723950)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 58
    Piecewise linear multilevel modeling simple time effects for outcomes With significant interaction effects.

    Piecewise linear multilevel modeling simple time effects for outcomes With significant interaction effects. by Jeremy William Eberle (21782060)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 59
    Frequency differences (%) of socio-demography characteristics and pre-tests between the experimental group and control group among buddies.

    Frequency differences (%) of socio-demography characteristics and pre-tests between the experimental group and control group among buddies. by Siti Noraini Asmuri (18297722)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 60
    Significant differences in alpha diversity and richness analysis between the three age groups.

    Significant differences in alpha diversity and richness analysis between the three age groups. by Jun Ma (9393)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: