Search alternatives:
significant reductions » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant predictors (Expand Search), significant predictor (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
reductions based » reduction based (Expand Search), predictions based (Expand Search), prediction based (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant reductions » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant predictors (Expand Search), significant predictor (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
reductions based » reduction based (Expand Search), predictions based (Expand Search), prediction based (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
121
-
122
-
123
-
124
ELECTRICAL NOISES REDUCTION IN NANOPORES EXPERIMENTS BASED ON CONSENSUS FILTER
Published 2021“…In this paper, we present a novel consensus filter-based noise reduction approach, which considerably improves the accuracy of the noise-filtered current traces and the signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). …”
-
125
Binary logistic regression analysis predicting reductions in SUVmax of ≥ 70% after radiotherapy.
Published 2021Subjects: -
126
-
127
-
128
-
129
-
130
-
131
-
132
-
133
Reductions in the variation of treatment costs for a given value after price negotiation.
Published 2024Subjects: -
134
-
135
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
136
-
137
-
138
-
139
-
140