Search alternatives:
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
increased decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 2,241 - 2,260 results of 13,040 for search '(( significant ((largest decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ) OR ( significantly increased decrease ))', query time: 0.53s Refine Results
  1. 2241
  2. 2242
  3. 2243
  4. 2244
  5. 2245
  6. 2246
  7. 2247
  8. 2248
  9. 2249
  10. 2250
  11. 2251

    Tuning curve sharpening and familiarity suppression. by Weifan Wang (4669081)

    Published 2025
    “…Both learning rules result in a statistically significant decrease in the SI. The inset shows the convergence of the distribution’s mean over training epochs. …”
  12. 2252

    Data. by Su Hwan Park (15158181)

    Published 2025
    “…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
  13. 2253

    Baseline characteristics of patients. by Su Hwan Park (15158181)

    Published 2025
    “…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
  14. 2254

    Supporting information. by Yu Sang Choi (22656230)

    Published 2025
    “…Also, the Chao1 index for richness were remarkably decreased in both MP-treated Lep KO and WT mice, but Shannon index for evenness were increased in only MP-treated Lep KO mice. …”
  15. 2255
  16. 2256

    Experimental procedures. by Ellen Chan (22177558)

    Published 2025
    “…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
  17. 2257

    Experimental procedures. by Ellen Chan (22177558)

    Published 2025
    “…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
  18. 2258

    Supplementary file of datasets. by Ellen Chan (22177558)

    Published 2025
    “…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
  19. 2259

    S1 File - by Zsófia Tróznai (19923854)

    Published 2024
    “…Larger body height increased the likelihood of selection by about 12%, larger muscle mass by 12% to 25%, larger bone age by 350–400%, while larger percent body fat decreased selection chances by 7%. …”
  20. 2260

    Flowchart of the selection program. by Zsófia Tróznai (19923854)

    Published 2024
    “…Larger body height increased the likelihood of selection by about 12%, larger muscle mass by 12% to 25%, larger bone age by 350–400%, while larger percent body fat decreased selection chances by 7%. …”