Search alternatives:
significant attention » significant potential (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search)
attention phases » attention based (Expand Search), saturation phases (Expand Search), attention paid (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
significant attention » significant potential (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search)
attention phases » attention based (Expand Search), saturation phases (Expand Search), attention paid (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
-
1
The expectation–attention interaction is significant for MSPCres but not MSPCstim.
Published 2019“…The expectation–attention interaction was not significant for MSPCstim (χ2 = 3.47, <i>P</i> < 0.05) but was highly significant for MSPCres (χ2 = 19.56, <i>P</i> < 0.001). …”
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Classifier evidence in the encoding and maintenance phases of the selective attention task.
Published 2024“…(C, top) Classifier evidence in the encoding phase. Significant cue by attention interactions were found in all ROIs. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20