Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), level increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), level increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
10061
Including: S1 Data–S75 Data.
Published 2025“…In this perspective, future studies should further examine the effects of risk/protective factors on different brain regions in order to deepen our understanding of the clinical significance of such increased and decreased CT and GMV.…”
-
10062
Multiomics Identified the Nutritional Improvement in LAB-Fermented Goat Milk
Published 2025“…Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in fermented goat milk (FGM) significantly alter its composition, though their effect on goat milk’s nutritional profile is not well understood. …”
-
10063
The effect of IFN-β and Vit D on the NF-κB and p-NF-κB protein.
Published 2025“…NF-κB protein expression was reduced in all groups compared to the control, but not significantly <b>(A)</b>. IFN-β, Vit D, and the co-treatment all decrease p-NF-κB protein expression in comparison with the control, but it was only significant for the co-treatment group <b>(B)</b>. …”
-
10064
Experimental procedures.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
10065
Experimental procedures.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
10066
Supplementary file of datasets.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
10067
Scatterplot 8.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was at a low level, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. …”
-
10068
Scatterplot 5.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was at a low level, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. …”
-
10069
Scatterplot 9.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was at a low level, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. …”
-
10070
Scatterplot 1.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was at a low level, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. …”
-
10071
Scatterplot 6.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was at a low level, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. …”
-
10072
Scatterplot 2.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was at a low level, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. …”
-
10073
Raw data of this study.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was at a low level, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. …”
-
10074
Scatterplot 4.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was at a low level, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. …”
-
10075
Scatterplot 3.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was at a low level, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. …”
-
10076
Correlation matrix.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was at a low level, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. …”
-
10077
Scatterplot 7.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was at a low level, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. …”
-
10078
Baseline characteristics of the four groups.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was at a low level, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. …”
-
10079
Flow of included patients through the trial.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was at a low level, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. …”
-
10080
Cox proportional hazards modeling.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was at a low level, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. …”