Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), level increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), level increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
10281
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
10282
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
10283
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
10284
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
10285
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
10286
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
10287
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
10288
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
10289
Hierarchical analysis scale mapping values.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Innovation and entrepreneurship vitality, as a key factors in the development of the digital economy, significantly affects both regional economic development and residents’ consumption capacity. …”
-
10290
Multicollinearity test.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Innovation and entrepreneurship vitality, as a key factors in the development of the digital economy, significantly affects both regional economic development and residents’ consumption capacity. …”
-
10291
Heterogeneity test for population structure.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Innovation and entrepreneurship vitality, as a key factors in the development of the digital economy, significantly affects both regional economic development and residents’ consumption capacity. …”
-
10292
Pearson test.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Innovation and entrepreneurship vitality, as a key factors in the development of the digital economy, significantly affects both regional economic development and residents’ consumption capacity. …”
-
10293
Description of variables.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Innovation and entrepreneurship vitality, as a key factors in the development of the digital economy, significantly affects both regional economic development and residents’ consumption capacity. …”
-
10294
Endogeneity test for variable lags.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Innovation and entrepreneurship vitality, as a key factors in the development of the digital economy, significantly affects both regional economic development and residents’ consumption capacity. …”
-
10295
Mediation effect test of educational investment.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Innovation and entrepreneurship vitality, as a key factors in the development of the digital economy, significantly affects both regional economic development and residents’ consumption capacity. …”
-
10296
Descriptive statistics of the main variables.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Innovation and entrepreneurship vitality, as a key factors in the development of the digital economy, significantly affects both regional economic development and residents’ consumption capacity. …”
-
10297
Dust particle size distribution.
Published 2025“…Specifically, when the return pipe diameter is 500 mm, and the horizontal distance between the drainage port of the return pipe and the bottom of the blanking pipe is 2000 mm, the dust removal efficiency reaches its optimal level. Field tests confirmed that after implementing the improved dust removal system, the ambient air dust concentration decreased to less than 2 mg/m³, representing a reduction of approximately 92.02% compared to pre-transformation levels. …”
-
10298
Model parameter setting.
Published 2025“…Specifically, when the return pipe diameter is 500 mm, and the horizontal distance between the drainage port of the return pipe and the bottom of the blanking pipe is 2000 mm, the dust removal efficiency reaches its optimal level. Field tests confirmed that after implementing the improved dust removal system, the ambient air dust concentration decreased to less than 2 mg/m³, representing a reduction of approximately 92.02% compared to pre-transformation levels. …”
-
10299
Grid division diagram.
Published 2025“…Specifically, when the return pipe diameter is 500 mm, and the horizontal distance between the drainage port of the return pipe and the bottom of the blanking pipe is 2000 mm, the dust removal efficiency reaches its optimal level. Field tests confirmed that after implementing the improved dust removal system, the ambient air dust concentration decreased to less than 2 mg/m³, representing a reduction of approximately 92.02% compared to pre-transformation levels. …”
-
10300
Unpowered dust removal device stereogram.
Published 2025“…Specifically, when the return pipe diameter is 500 mm, and the horizontal distance between the drainage port of the return pipe and the bottom of the blanking pipe is 2000 mm, the dust removal efficiency reaches its optimal level. Field tests confirmed that after implementing the improved dust removal system, the ambient air dust concentration decreased to less than 2 mg/m³, representing a reduction of approximately 92.02% compared to pre-transformation levels. …”