Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), level increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), level increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
13001
Table 1_Effects of different spraying periods and concentrations of paclobutrazol on the lodging resistance and yield of high-quality japonica rice.xlsx
Published 2025“…In the early stages of spraying (S1, S2 and S3), the lodging resistance of rice was primarily enhanced by reducing plant height, but led to a significant decrease in the spikelets per panicle and grain filling, ultimately resulting in reduced yield. …”
-
13002
Supplementary Material for: Healing Diabetic Foot Ulcers with Topical Timolol Improves Healed Epithelial Integrity
Published 2025“…The use of a wheelchair was also associated with a significant decrease in transepidermal water loss (Estimate = -7.7, p=0.01). …”
-
13003
Data Sheet 1_Dynamic electrophysiological changes in abnormal brain cavities post-ischemic stroke.docx
Published 2025“…We observed significant decreases in power across different conditions (p < 0.0001), and this decrease varied in different locations. …”
-
13004
Supplementary file 1_Effects of different spraying periods and concentrations of paclobutrazol on the lodging resistance and yield of high-quality japonica rice.doc
Published 2025“…In the early stages of spraying (S1, S2 and S3), the lodging resistance of rice was primarily enhanced by reducing plant height, but led to a significant decrease in the spikelets per panicle and grain filling, ultimately resulting in reduced yield. …”
-
13005
Table 2_Effects of different spraying periods and concentrations of paclobutrazol on the lodging resistance and yield of high-quality japonica rice.xlsx
Published 2025“…In the early stages of spraying (S1, S2 and S3), the lodging resistance of rice was primarily enhanced by reducing plant height, but led to a significant decrease in the spikelets per panicle and grain filling, ultimately resulting in reduced yield. …”
-
13006
Effect of regional nerve block on tourniquet-related injury in pediatric patients undergoing lower limb surgery: a randomized controlled study
Published 2025“…Additionally, patients in the PNB group had a significantly shorter time to first ambulation and a shorter hospital length of stay.…”
-
13007
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
13008
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
13009
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
13010
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
13011
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
13012
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
13013
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
13014
Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
13015
Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
13016
Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
13017
Table 1_Effects of eculizumab and rituximab on visual function, motor function and social quality in patients with NMOSD: a comparative study.docx
Published 2025“…Social function (SFS) improved significantly in both groups, with greater gains in the EG (P < 0.001). …”
-
13018
Table 1_Effect of a mindfulness-based cognitive behavior therapy intervention on occupational burnout among school teachers.docx
Published 2025“…No significant differences between the arms were found in the post-test mean levels of EE, DP, and PA. …”
-
13019
Image 1_Gut metagenomic features of frailty.tiff
Published 2024“…Microbial diversity decreased significantly with increasing frailty. Beta diversity analysis revealed distinct clustering patterns based at phylum level. …”
-
13020
Table 1_Gut metagenomic features of frailty.xlsx
Published 2024“…Microbial diversity decreased significantly with increasing frailty. Beta diversity analysis revealed distinct clustering patterns based at phylum level. …”