Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), level increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), level increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
9441
-
9442
-
9443
-
9444
-
9445
-
9446
-
9447
-
9448
-
9449
-
9450
-
9451
-
9452
-
9453
Spatial econometric model estimation results.
Published 2025“…In the stage of high-quality development (2012 present), the contribution rate of technological factors continued to rise and become the dominant factor, while the contribution rate of land factors has decreased to a lower level. (2) Regarding spatial characteristics, the spatial econometric model reveals significant spatial agglomeration characteristics of capital and labor, and land factors positively affect local and neighboring economic growth. …”
-
9454
Description of various production factors.
Published 2025“…In the stage of high-quality development (2012 present), the contribution rate of technological factors continued to rise and become the dominant factor, while the contribution rate of land factors has decreased to a lower level. (2) Regarding spatial characteristics, the spatial econometric model reveals significant spatial agglomeration characteristics of capital and labor, and land factors positively affect local and neighboring economic growth. …”
-
9455
Regression coefficients of production function.
Published 2025“…In the stage of high-quality development (2012 present), the contribution rate of technological factors continued to rise and become the dominant factor, while the contribution rate of land factors has decreased to a lower level. (2) Regarding spatial characteristics, the spatial econometric model reveals significant spatial agglomeration characteristics of capital and labor, and land factors positively affect local and neighboring economic growth. …”
-
9456
Production function regression ridge trace.
Published 2025“…In the stage of high-quality development (2012 present), the contribution rate of technological factors continued to rise and become the dominant factor, while the contribution rate of land factors has decreased to a lower level. (2) Regarding spatial characteristics, the spatial econometric model reveals significant spatial agglomeration characteristics of capital and labor, and land factors positively affect local and neighboring economic growth. …”
-
9457
Model test results.
Published 2025“…In the stage of high-quality development (2012 present), the contribution rate of technological factors continued to rise and become the dominant factor, while the contribution rate of land factors has decreased to a lower level. (2) Regarding spatial characteristics, the spatial econometric model reveals significant spatial agglomeration characteristics of capital and labor, and land factors positively affect local and neighboring economic growth. …”
-
9458
GWAS analysis using Cluster 2 data (shown in S1 Fig).
Published 2024“…The dashed line indicates the permuted threshold for genome-wide significance <b><i>p</i></b> = <b>3.68</b>×<b>10</b><sup><b>−5</b></sup>(0.05/1357 SNPs). …”
-
9459
A working model for the RRSV Pns10-promoted RRSV infection in <i>N. lugens</i> through inducing NlNDUFS1-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis.
Published 2025“…This impairment of mitochondrial complex I activity results in a significant decrease of ATP production and an increase of mitochondrial ROS production, which causes mitochondrial apoptosis to facilitate RRSV infection in <i><i>N. lugens</i></i>.…”
-
9460
GWAS analysis using Cluster 3 data (shown in S1 Fig).
Published 2024“…The dashed line indicates the permuted threshold for genome-wide significance <b><i>p</i></b> = 2<b>.80</b>×<b>10</b><sup><b>−5</b></sup>(0.05/1784 SNPs). …”