Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
level increased » levels increased (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search), gene increased (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), level disease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
level increased » levels increased (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search), gene increased (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), level disease (Expand Search)
-
19601
-
19602
-
19603
-
19604
Tumoral Nanovesicles-Loaded Magnetotactic Bacteria for Tumor-Targeted Therapy under a Swing Magnetic Field
Published 2025“…Finally, it is revealed that the NVs-loaded AMB-1 induced a decrease in cellular viability and significantly inhibited the growth of tumors <i>in vivo</i> under the sMF. …”
-
19605
Raw data.
Published 2025“…In the PTZ-induced seizure model, the application of CAF in doses over 50 mg/L resulted in a decrease in the average movement. TPM ( > 50 μM) significantly protected larvae against the PTZ. …”
-
19606
Tumoral Nanovesicles-Loaded Magnetotactic Bacteria for Tumor-Targeted Therapy under a Swing Magnetic Field
Published 2025“…Finally, it is revealed that the NVs-loaded AMB-1 induced a decrease in cellular viability and significantly inhibited the growth of tumors <i>in vivo</i> under the sMF. …”
-
19607
-
19608
Driving variables recorded from the simulator.
Published 2025“…Additionally, HF conversation was associated with a decrease in ART among conservative participants, while it significantly increased TIBL for both moderate and conservative groups. …”
-
19609
-
19610
Primers for polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
Published 2025“…Ticks subjected to immersion in cystatin antibodies exhibited a significantly increased mortality rate after 72 hours. …”
-
19611
Moderating effect test I.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19612
Descriptive statistics.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19613
Baseline regression.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19614
Robustness tests I.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19615
Endogeneity tests II.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19616
Endogeneity test I.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19617
Heterogeneity test II.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19618
Robustness tests II.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19619
Heterogeneity test III.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19620
Balance test.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”