بدائل البحث:
significant largest » significantly larger (توسيع البحث), significant changes (توسيع البحث), significant dangers (توسيع البحث)
largest decrease » larger decrease (توسيع البحث), marked decrease (توسيع البحث)
level decrease » levels decreased (توسيع البحث), level increased (توسيع البحث), level disease (توسيع البحث)
teer decrease » mean decrease (توسيع البحث), greater decrease (توسيع البحث)
significant largest » significantly larger (توسيع البحث), significant changes (توسيع البحث), significant dangers (توسيع البحث)
largest decrease » larger decrease (توسيع البحث), marked decrease (توسيع البحث)
level decrease » levels decreased (توسيع البحث), level increased (توسيع البحث), level disease (توسيع البحث)
teer decrease » mean decrease (توسيع البحث), greater decrease (توسيع البحث)
-
81
-
82
-
83
The effects of CGA on NLRP3 inflammasome and the Nrf2 pathway in HK-2 cells.
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
84
Sodium level changes in matched restaurant menu items (2016–2020) by UK NSRI food category.
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
85
-
86
Second-order partial correlation analysis of sectoral water use in China from 2005 to 2022.
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
87
Time evolution trend of green finance level.
منشور في 2025"…Within them, the CCD of Chengdu is the highest, Chongqing has achieved the largest stage leap. (4) The global Moran’s I consistently remained positive and exhibited a tendency of initially rising and subsequently falling, indicating that the spatial aggregation effect of CCD-GFEE first increased and then decreased. (5) The CCD-GFEE driving factors are examined using the spatial econometric model, and it has been observed that the impact of population size and government intervention on CCD-GFEE is negative, while the impact of industrial structure, technological progress and economic level on the coupling and coordination of CCD-GFEE is positive. …"
-
88
-
89
-
90
Factors and levels.
منشور في 2024"…The highest average relative flows across three sediment levels occurred under the F1 treatment, measuring 0.699, 0.681, and 0.668 for type-H<sub>1</sub>, type-H<sub>2</sub>, and type-H<sub>3</sub> tapes, respectively. …"
-
91
-
92
-
93
-
94
-
95
-
96
-
97
-
98
-
99
-
100