Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
-
19641
Soil mechanical parameters.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
19642
Parameters of the contact surface.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
19643
-
19644
The schematic diagram of free-field boundary.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
19645
Residual deformation parameters of soil.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
19646
Soil fluid and liquefaction parameters.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
19647
PL-Finn model development procedure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
19648
-
19649
-
19650
-
19651
Key modeling details for CoVPF and controls.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, we found that accounting for epistasis was critical, as ignoring epistasis led to a 43% decrease in forecasting accuracy. Case studies showed that CoVPF delivered more accurate and timely forecasts for lineage expansions and inflections such as EG.5.1 and XBB.1.5. …”
-
19652
-
19653
LSTM model.
Published 2025“…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
-
19654
CNN model.
Published 2025“…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
-
19655
Ceramic bearings.
Published 2025“…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
-
19656
Geometric contact arc length model.
Published 2025“…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
-
19657
Indentation fracture mechanics model.
Published 2025“…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
-
19658
Grinding particle cutting machining model.
Published 2025“…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
-
19659
Three stages of abrasive cutting process.
Published 2025“…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
-
19660
CNN-LSTM action recognition process.
Published 2025“…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”