Search alternatives:
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
361
-
362
-
363
-
364
-
365
-
366
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
367
-
368
-
369
-
370
-
371
-
372
Cross-sectional dependence results.
Published 2024“…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”
-
373
Autocorrelation test results.
Published 2024“…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”
-
374
Pesaran’s CADF test results for Model I.
Published 2024“…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”
-
375
Descriptive statistics of related variables.
Published 2024“…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”
-
376
-
377
The percentage of studies that resulted in insect death increased over time.
Published 2025“…<p>There was a significant increase in the proportion of studies containing insect death (with or without handling) over time (linear regression; t<sub>20,18</sub> = 2.33, p = 0.031, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.23). …”
-
378
Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
379
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
380