بدائل البحث:
significant potential » significant positive (توسيع البحث)
potential based » potential biases (توسيع البحث), potential bias (توسيع البحث), potential causal (توسيع البحث)
main decrease » gain decreased (توسيع البحث), mean decrease (توسيع البحث), small decrease (توسيع البحث)
a decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), _ decreased (توسيع البحث), _ decreases (توسيع البحث)
significant potential » significant positive (توسيع البحث)
potential based » potential biases (توسيع البحث), potential bias (توسيع البحث), potential causal (توسيع البحث)
main decrease » gain decreased (توسيع البحث), mean decrease (توسيع البحث), small decrease (توسيع البحث)
a decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), _ decreased (توسيع البحث), _ decreases (توسيع البحث)
-
41
-
42
-
43
-
44
-
45
-
46
-
47
-
48
Predictive Significance of Glycosyltransferase-Related lncRNAs in Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis and Experimental Validation
منشور في 2025"…And the low-risk cohort exhibited increased immune infiltration and decreased tumor purity. Additionally, significant differences in tumor mutation profiles were observed, with the tumor mutation burden (TMB) being higher in the low-risk cohort, suggesting a potentially better response to immunotherapy. …"
-
49
MEG main effect of material: Word-faces.
منشور في 2019"…<p>(A) Main effect of material: word versus face condition irrespective of memory: significant clusters (<i>p</i><sub>corr</sub> < 0.05) returned by a cluster permutation statistic clustering across sensors, frequencies (“Freq”), and channels. …"
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
-
54
-
55
-
56
-
57
-
58
-
59
Decreased <i>CLU</i> expression in VWD ECFCs and in Low-VWF expressing ECs.
منشور في 2024الموضوعات: -
60
The main effects of PRGDP and Gi on SWB.
منشور في 2024"…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …"