Showing 1 - 20 results of 47,376 for search '(( significant ((main decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( significant cause increase ))', query time: 0.96s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

    Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

    Published 2024
    “…(B) In dCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.132 ± 0.048, APP/PS1 = 0.128 ± 0.051, p < 0.005, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions). …”
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

    Synaptopathy at IHC-SGN synapses decreases the peak of the CAP significantly, without changes to peak latency and width. by Maral Budak (6680351)

    Published 2021
    “…Shaded regions correspond to the standard error of the mean and dashed lines correspond to the peaks of each CAP, labeled with the same colors as the CAPs. …”
  13. 13

    Mean values of participants’ heart rate. by Ezel Üsten (16548547)

    Published 2023
    “…Additionally, a motivational decrease was observed for the high motivation group due to the interruption. …”
  14. 14

    Mean values of participants’ heart rate. by Ezel Üsten (16548547)

    Published 2023
    “…Additionally, a motivational decrease was observed for the high motivation group due to the interruption. …”
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17

    Capsaicin, pyridoxine, vincristine sulfate and ionomycin significantly decreased axon length ratio but only pyridoxine had no impact on neurotoxicity. by Fei San Lee (17282886)

    Published 2024
    “…(<b>C</b>) Pyr at 500 μM significantly decreased axon length ratio over time and was significantly lower than PBS control by day 3. …”
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20

    The main effects of PRGDP and Gi on SWB. by Feng Huang (62988)

    Published 2024
    “…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”