Search alternatives:
significant colocalization » significant complication (Expand Search), significant neutralization (Expand Search), significant association (Expand Search)
colocalization result » localization results (Expand Search), localization recall (Expand Search)
main decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
significant colocalization » significant complication (Expand Search), significant neutralization (Expand Search), significant association (Expand Search)
colocalization result » localization results (Expand Search), localization recall (Expand Search)
main decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Full Colocalization result of plasma proteins with significant causal relationships to rheumatoid arthritis.
Published 2025“…<p>Full Colocalization result of plasma proteins with significant causal relationships to rheumatoid arthritis.…”
-
4
-
5
-
6
COLOC results for loci with a nominally significant local genetic correlation.
Published 2025“…<p>COLOC results for loci with a nominally significant local genetic correlation.…”
-
7
Result of colocalization and functional enrichment analysis.
Published 2025“…</b> This panel illustrates the colocalization results for DeP and RA. The left plot shows a scatter plot of -log10(p-values) for depression (x-axis) and RA (y-axis), with each point representing a SNP. …”
-
8
-
9
Mean values of participants’ heart rate.
Published 2023“…Additionally, a motivational decrease was observed for the high motivation group due to the interruption. …”
-
10
Mean values of participants’ heart rate.
Published 2023“…Additionally, a motivational decrease was observed for the high motivation group due to the interruption. …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
The main effects of PRGDP and Gi on SWB.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20