Search alternatives:
significantly positive » significantly positively (Expand Search), significant positive (Expand Search), significantly negatively (Expand Search)
positive models » additive models (Expand Search), positive pools (Expand Search), posit models (Expand Search)
main decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
significantly positive » significantly positively (Expand Search), significant positive (Expand Search), significantly negatively (Expand Search)
positive models » additive models (Expand Search), positive pools (Expand Search), posit models (Expand Search)
main decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Synaptopathy at IHC-SGN synapses decreases the peak of the CAP significantly, without changes to peak latency and width.
Published 2021“…Shaded regions correspond to the standard error of the mean and dashed lines correspond to the peaks of each CAP, labeled with the same colors as the CAPs. …”
-
5
-
6
-
7
Mean values of participants’ heart rate.
Published 2023“…Additionally, a motivational decrease was observed for the high motivation group due to the interruption. …”
-
8
Mean values of participants’ heart rate.
Published 2023“…Additionally, a motivational decrease was observed for the high motivation group due to the interruption. …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
Longer <i>L</i><sub><i>h</i></sub> significantly decreases and delays the peak of the sound-evoked CAPs of SGN fibers.
Published 2021“…The decreased peak amplitude and increased latency of CAP peak were significant for populations with <i>L</i><sub><i>h</i></sub> > 2 μm. …”
-
12
Longer <i>L</i><sub><i>u</i></sub> significantly decreases and delays the peak of the sound-evoked CAPs of SGN fibers.
Published 2021“…The decrease and delay of peak CAPs were significant for populations with <i>L</i><sub><i>u</i></sub> > 11 μm. …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
The main effects of PRGDP and Gi on SWB.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20