Search alternatives:
significantly predictions » significantly predictive (Expand Search), significant predictors (Expand Search), significant reductions (Expand Search)
predictions based » prediction based (Expand Search), prediction tasks (Expand Search)
main decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
significantly predictions » significantly predictive (Expand Search), significant predictors (Expand Search), significant reductions (Expand Search)
predictions based » prediction based (Expand Search), prediction tasks (Expand Search)
main decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
The variables that significantly predicted litter clump weight in shelter cats.
Published 2025“…C) Fewer days in the study predicted greater urine output (p = .034). The black line represents the line of best fit based on the reduced model with marginal means. …”
-
3
-
4
-
5
Mean values of participants’ heart rate.
Published 2023“…Additionally, a motivational decrease was observed for the high motivation group due to the interruption. …”
-
6
Mean values of participants’ heart rate.
Published 2023“…Additionally, a motivational decrease was observed for the high motivation group due to the interruption. …”
-
7
Cat Stress Score (CSS) was significantly predicted by intake type and days in the study.
Published 2025“…B) More days in the study predicted lower CSS (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The black line represents the line of best fit based on the reduced model with marginal means. …”
-
8
-
9
The main effects of PRGDP and Gi on SWB.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20