Showing 1 - 20 results of 68,946 for search '(( significant ((main decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( significantly predictive model ))', query time: 1.11s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

    Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

    Published 2024
    “…(B) In dCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.132 ± 0.048, APP/PS1 = 0.128 ± 0.051, p < 0.005, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions). …”
  4. 4

    The variables that significantly predicted litter clump weight in shelter cats. by Allison Andrukonis (11846404)

    Published 2025
    “…C) Fewer days in the study predicted greater urine output (p = .034). The black line represents the line of best fit based on the reduced model with marginal means. …”
  5. 5
  6. 6

    Mean values of participants’ heart rate. by Ezel Üsten (16548547)

    Published 2023
    “…Additionally, a motivational decrease was observed for the high motivation group due to the interruption. …”
  7. 7

    Mean values of participants’ heart rate. by Ezel Üsten (16548547)

    Published 2023
    “…Additionally, a motivational decrease was observed for the high motivation group due to the interruption. …”
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

    Cat Stress Score (CSS) was significantly predicted by intake type and days in the study. by Allison Andrukonis (11846404)

    Published 2025
    “…B) More days in the study predicted lower CSS (<i>p</i> <  0.001). The black line represents the line of best fit based on the reduced model with marginal means. …”
  11. 11

    Predicted banana distribution map (2016) using logistic regression model M2-12 fitted using 12 covariates and significant two-way combinations. by Dennis Ochola (11626912)

    Published 2022
    “…<p>Predicted banana distribution map (2016) using logistic regression model M2-12 fitted using 12 covariates and significant two-way combinations.…”
  12. 12
  13. 13

    The main effects of PRGDP and Gi on SWB. by Feng Huang (62988)

    Published 2024
    “…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20