بدائل البحث:
significant reductions » significant reduction (توسيع البحث), significant predictors (توسيع البحث), significant predictor (توسيع البحث)
reductions group » education group (توسيع البحث), predictions grouped (توسيع البحث), education groups (توسيع البحث)
marked decrease » marked increase (توسيع البحث)
significant reductions » significant reduction (توسيع البحث), significant predictors (توسيع البحث), significant predictor (توسيع البحث)
reductions group » education group (توسيع البحث), predictions grouped (توسيع البحث), education groups (توسيع البحث)
marked decrease » marked increase (توسيع البحث)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Change in Watt’s Connectedness Scale (WCS), General Connectedness by Treatment Group.
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
14
-
15
-
16
Data_Sheet_1_Immune and Neuroendocrine Trait and State Markers in Psychotic Illness: Decreased Kynurenines Marking Psychotic Exacerbations.docx
منشور في 2020"…</p><p>Conclusion: The acute psychotic state is marked by state-specific increases of immune markers and decreases in peripheral IDO pathway markers. …"
-
17
-
18
Lab parameters–Significant reduction in means.
منشور في 2023"…Adjuvant homoeopathic medicines were given in the treatment group and SOC was given to both groups. The duration of oxygen support was compared as the primary outcome. …"
-
19
-
20
Results of a meta-analysis of the surgery risk factors: A: Number of implants: there was no significant difference in number of implants between two groups (1 vs > 1); B: Reduction: there was significant difference in reduction between two groups (reduction vs no reduction); C: Reduction method: there was significant difference in reduction method between two groups (closed vs open); D: Delayed surgery: there was no significant difference in delayed surgery between two groups (≤24h vs > 24h); E: Capsular decompression: there was no significant difference in capsular decompression between two groups (decompression vs no decompression).
منشور في 2025"…<p>Results of a meta-analysis of the surgery risk factors: A: Number of implants: there was no significant difference in number of implants between two groups (1 vs > 1); B: Reduction: there was significant difference in reduction between two groups (reduction vs no reduction); C: Reduction method: there was significant difference in reduction method between two groups (closed vs open); D: Delayed surgery: there was no significant difference in delayed surgery between two groups (≤24h vs > 24h); E: Capsular decompression: there was no significant difference in capsular decompression between two groups (decompression vs no decompression).…"