Search alternatives:
significant concentration » significant concentrations (Expand Search), significant correlation (Expand Search), significant connection (Expand Search)
concentration levels » concentration index (Expand Search), concentration time (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
significant concentration » significant concentrations (Expand Search), significant correlation (Expand Search), significant connection (Expand Search)
concentration levels » concentration index (Expand Search), concentration time (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Maximum IFN concentrations are decreased in severe patients.
Published 2025“…B) Model predictions of mean values of maximal IFN concentrations in mild and severe virtual patients. Statistical differences in maximal IFN values between groups are marked by a level of significance (*) estimated based on p-values above the box plots (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005; ***, p < 0.0005; ****, p < 5e-5). …”
-
7
-
8
Decrease of the mean number of natural teeth and POPs with age.
Published 2021“…<p>The number of (A) natural teeth and (B) POPs significantly decreased with age in both males and females (<i>P</i> < 0.001). …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
The serum concentrations of cytokines between good responders and poor responders to TFESI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
13
Pre-RT and post RT D-dimer levels in associated with prognostic significance.
Published 2025Subjects: -
14
The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.
Published 2024“…<p>The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.</p>…”
-
15
Decreased NO concentrations and impairment of eNOS localization in EHD2 del/del mesenteric arteries.
Published 2019“…Graphs illustrate each replicate with mean +/- SE, t-test or Mann Whitney U test were used to calculate significance, *** P<0.0001; n.s. not significant.…”
-
16
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20