Search alternatives:
significant optimization » significant limitation (Expand Search), significant application (Expand Search), significant association (Expand Search)
optimization determined » neutralization determined (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant optimization » significant limitation (Expand Search), significant application (Expand Search), significant association (Expand Search)
optimization determined » neutralization determined (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
Mean TTC under different weights.
Published 2024“…Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. …”
-
2
SD and mean TTC under different weights.
Published 2024“…Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. …”
-
3
Results of mean differences.
Published 2023“…A simulation was conducted to identify 20 scenarios in order to discover the optimal scenario in which where the number of requests (stretchers or wheelchairs) was increased, while the number of staff was decreased to determine mean waiting times and confidence intervals. …”
-
4
SD under different weights.
Published 2024“…Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. …”
-
5
Model framework.
Published 2024“…Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. …”
-
6
Vehicle travel time.
Published 2024“…Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. …”
-
7
SD under different penetration rates.
Published 2024“…Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. …”
-
8
Notation description.
Published 2024“…Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. …”
-
9
Five-stage speed adjustment.
Published 2024“…Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. …”
-
10
Parameter values.
Published 2024“…Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. …”
-
11
Data_Sheet_1_Planning With Patient-Specific Rectal Sub-Region Constraints Decreases Probability of Toxicity in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy.pdf
Published 2020“…Translating the SRR to patient-specific radiotherapy planning is challenging as new constraints have to be defined. A recent geometry-based model proposed to optimize the planning by determining the achievable mean doses (AMDs) to the organs at risk (OARs), taking into account the overlap between the planning target volume (PTV) and OAR. …”
-
12
Snake optimizer algorithm optimization process.
Published 2023“…In comparison to conventional approaches such as the least squares method (LS) and the Kalman filter method (KF), the proposed SO-LSTM-based positioning method significantly reduces the root mean square error (RMSE) by 63.39% and 58.01%, respectively, while also decreasing the maximum positioning error (MPE) by 60.77% and 52.65%.…”
-
13
Intra-hospital patient transfer algorithm.
Published 2023“…A simulation was conducted to identify 20 scenarios in order to discover the optimal scenario in which where the number of requests (stretchers or wheelchairs) was increased, while the number of staff was decreased to determine mean waiting times and confidence intervals. …”
-
14
Detail results of simulation.
Published 2023“…A simulation was conducted to identify 20 scenarios in order to discover the optimal scenario in which where the number of requests (stretchers or wheelchairs) was increased, while the number of staff was decreased to determine mean waiting times and confidence intervals. …”
-
15
Data collection for simulation modeling.
Published 2023“…A simulation was conducted to identify 20 scenarios in order to discover the optimal scenario in which where the number of requests (stretchers or wheelchairs) was increased, while the number of staff was decreased to determine mean waiting times and confidence intervals. …”
-
16
Waiting time results.
Published 2023“…A simulation was conducted to identify 20 scenarios in order to discover the optimal scenario in which where the number of requests (stretchers or wheelchairs) was increased, while the number of staff was decreased to determine mean waiting times and confidence intervals. …”
-
17
Schedule of internal arrival times.
Published 2023“…A simulation was conducted to identify 20 scenarios in order to discover the optimal scenario in which where the number of requests (stretchers or wheelchairs) was increased, while the number of staff was decreased to determine mean waiting times and confidence intervals. …”
-
18
Conditions for the simulation model.
Published 2023“…A simulation was conducted to identify 20 scenarios in order to discover the optimal scenario in which where the number of requests (stretchers or wheelchairs) was increased, while the number of staff was decreased to determine mean waiting times and confidence intervals. …”
-
19
Simulation scenarios.
Published 2023“…A simulation was conducted to identify 20 scenarios in order to discover the optimal scenario in which where the number of requests (stretchers or wheelchairs) was increased, while the number of staff was decreased to determine mean waiting times and confidence intervals. …”
-
20
Model code and scenarios.
Published 2023“…A simulation was conducted to identify 20 scenarios in order to discover the optimal scenario in which where the number of requests (stretchers or wheelchairs) was increased, while the number of staff was decreased to determine mean waiting times and confidence intervals. …”