Search alternatives:
significant pe » significant p (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search)
pe increased » use increased (Expand Search), age increased (Expand Search), _ increased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant pe » significant p (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search)
pe increased » use increased (Expand Search), age increased (Expand Search), _ increased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.
Published 2024“…<p>The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.…”
-
3
Decrease of the mean number of natural teeth and POPs with age.
Published 2021“…<p>The number of (A) natural teeth and (B) POPs significantly decreased with age in both males and females (<i>P</i> < 0.001). …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Forest plot of subgroup analysis for the pooled WMD estimate of PC by PE severity.
Published 2022Subjects: -
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Egger’s test of publication bias for the pooled MD estimate of MPV between PE and NT groups.
Published 2022Subjects: -
16
Egger’stest of publication bias for the pooled WMD estimate of PC between PE and NT groups.
Published 2022Subjects: -
17
Forest plot of included studies for the pooled WMD estimate of PC between PE and NT groups.
Published 2022Subjects: -
18
-
19
-
20