Search alternatives:
significant prediction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant predictor (Expand Search), significant predictive (Expand Search)
prediction based » prediction model (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant prediction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant predictor (Expand Search), significant predictive (Expand Search)
prediction based » prediction model (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
121
-
122
-
123
-
124
-
125
-
126
Variables for the bromeliad agent representing a single <i>T. utriculata</i> rosette.
Published 2025Subjects: -
127
-
128
Errors and false starts on the PVT decrease following acclimatization.
Published 2019“…Mean reaction times did not decrease significantly with acclimatization. …”
-
129
-
130
-
131
-
132
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
133
-
134
-
135
-
136
Depleted antibody secreting cells did not result in decreased donor specific antibody in non-sensitized animals.
Published 2022“…IgG1<sup>+</sup> in the T cell flow crossmatch was the only DSA that BLyS<sup>-/-</sup> significantly decreased compared to APRIL<sup>-/-</sup> (p<0.03). …”
-
137
-
138
-
139
ARHGAP15 decreases intracellular ROS through inhibiting RAC1.
Published 2023“…Data was shown as mean±SD. ns: no significance, ***<i>P</i><0.001.</p>…”
-
140
Cinacalcet administered early in the inactive phase markedly decrease parathyroid Ki-67 index.
Published 2025“…All groups were compared by Kruskal Wallis test with <i>post hoc</i> test after Dunn with Bonferroni adjustment showing significant decreased Ki-67 labeling index of <i>Cina1</i> compared to <i>Cina2</i> (p = 0.006) and the untreated CKD groups (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0002, respectively). …”