Search alternatives:
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
effect ate » effect due (Expand Search), effect qtl (Expand Search), effect a (Expand Search)
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
effect ate » effect due (Expand Search), effect qtl (Expand Search), effect a (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Competing risk model for the ATE effect.
Published 2024“…Competing risk models on weighted cohorts were used to derive the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) and the Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) in subgroups of interest. …”
-
5
-
6
SUI-sEVs decreased the proliferation of fibroblasts.
Published 2021“…(B) The percentage of proliferative fibroblasts in three groups. SUI-sEVs significantly decreased the proliferation of fibroblasts after 72h when compared to the cells in control group and treated with the non SUI-sEVs. …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
The ATE evaluation values of different SLAM.
Published 2025“…Second, the lightweight YOLOv8n model is integrated to detect and remove feature points in dynamic regions in real-time, effectively reducing the impact of dynamic interference on pose estimation. …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
SUI-sEVs decreased the migration ability of primary cultured fibroblasts.
Published 2021“…(B) The variation of scratching space between groups is shown in the line chart. SUI-sEVs significant decreased the migration ability of primary cultured fibroblasts at 48h when compared to the cells in control group and treated with the non SUI-sEVs. …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
Decreased clonogenic capacity of U87MG and U251MG glioma cells dependent on SHG-44 concentration.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> A significant decrease in the proliferative clonal capacity of U87MG colonies was observed with 70ΜM and 100ΜM SHG-44 treatment. …”
-
19
-
20