Showing 1 - 20 results of 20,443 for search '(( significant ((mean decrease) OR (teer decrease)) ) OR ( significant attention increases ))', query time: 0.62s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

    ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention. by Isabel Raposo (21615517)

    Published 2025
    “…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
  5. 5
  6. 6

    Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers. by Luqiong Liu (11537092)

    Published 2024
    “…The values are expressed as the means ± SDs and were analyzed according to the variance of the factorial design. **, *** and ****denote <i>p</i> < 0.01, < 0.001 and < 0.0001, respectively; ns  =  not significant.…”
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

    The expectation–attention interaction is significant for MSPCres but not MSPCstim. by Noam Gordon (661276)

    Published 2019
    “…The expectation–attention interaction was not significant for MSPCstim (χ2 = 3.47, <i>P</i> < 0.05) but was highly significant for MSPCres (χ2 = 19.56, <i>P</i> < 0.001). …”
  13. 13

    Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) (N = 6). by Shirko Marcel Shokr (19173337)

    Published 2024
    “…<p><b>(A)</b> During the cultivation of SMC and ALI we observed significantly differences on day 18 (SMC: 9.61 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 7.73 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) and day 25 (SMC: 8.19 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 6.44 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) ALI cultures showed significantly decreased values compared to SMC. …”
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20

    Fig 5 - by Amanda C. Hahn (17241106)

    Published 2024
    Subjects: