Search alternatives:
significant deviation » significant variation (Expand Search), significant elevation (Expand Search), significant variations (Expand Search)
deviation effect » mediation effect (Expand Search), mediation effects (Expand Search), detection effect (Expand Search)
nn decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
significant deviation » significant variation (Expand Search), significant elevation (Expand Search), significant variations (Expand Search)
deviation effect » mediation effect (Expand Search), mediation effects (Expand Search), detection effect (Expand Search)
nn decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
2
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
-
3
Mean scores, standard deviations, and significance on key measures and subscales by gender group.
Published 2025Subjects: -
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Means, standard deviations, ranges, and frequencies for the sample’s demographic characteristics.
Published 2022Subjects: -
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
General linear mixed model coefficients and significance for species-specific ungulate intensity of use as a function of cattle grazing period.
Published 2024“…<p>Summary table of general linear mixed model describing the weekly intensity of use for each native ungulate species (where elk is the reference category and WT deer is white-tailed deer) and grazing period (where ‘before’ cattle grazing is the reference category), parameter estimates, their standard error (SE) and significance are given. Camera location was included as a random effect (variance = 0.488 and standard deviation = 0.699), the model had strong support (wi = 0.95) and fit the data well (AIC = 693.790, logLik = -330.890, Conditional R<sup>2</sup> = 0.40, and Marginal R<sup>2</sup> = 0.86).…”
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Mean and standard deviations for each benthic category and for each survey year.
Published 2024Subjects: -
19
-
20