Showing 21 - 40 results of 174,400 for search '(( significant ((nn decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( significant differences between ))', query time: 1.89s Refine Results
  1. 21

    Significance of Differences Between Groups by Alyssa Zisk (20161845)

    Published 2024
    “…<p dir="ltr">Results addressing the statistical significance of differences between groups for each of the 119 terms asked about in the survey. …”
  2. 22
  3. 23
  4. 24

    M<sup>pro</sup> confers a significant reduction in growth in yeast caused by decreases in a variety of cellular proteins. by Jin Ou (16914305)

    Published 2023
    “…Plots in A, B, C show averages from three biological replicates and error bars are standard deviations. (***) indicates differences (p<0.001)between EV and tested genes.</p>…”
  5. 25
  6. 26

    Deletion of <i>Trgal11</i> resulted in a significant decrease in the transcription of cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase but not β-glucosidase genes. by Fanglin Zheng (4844064)

    Published 2020
    “…No significant differences (t-test, P>0.05, n.s.) were detected for <i>bgl1</i> and <i>bgl2</i> gene transcription between QM9414 and Δ<i>Trgal11</i> for the indicated time points after induction except <i>bgl1</i> gene transcription induction for 12 h.…”
  7. 27

    Volcano plots indicating the plasma metabolic features that significantly differ between high-fat diet-fed and chow-fed minipigs stratified by sex. by Ditte Olsen Lützhøft (10837857)

    Published 2024
    “…Significant features must have a greater than two-fold difference between the groups in their abundance and an FDR-adjusted p < 0.05. …”
  8. 28

    The significant differences between the two groups. by Ahmed Hassan Rakha (13863762)

    Published 2023
    “…<p>The significant differences between the two groups.</p>…”
  9. 29

    Significant differences between clusters on importance. by Padraic Rocliffe (16436723)

    Published 2023
    “…<p>Significant differences between clusters on importance.…”
  10. 30

    Significant differences between clusters on modifiability. by Padraic Rocliffe (16436723)

    Published 2023
    “…<p>Significant differences between clusters on modifiability.…”
  11. 31

    Significantly differentially abundant microbial taxa at the genus level. by Yoshiaki Sato (2170141)

    Published 2020
    “…<p>Genera with significant differences (adjusted P < 0.05) identified using DESeq2 between (A) CON and FAL, (B) CON and FAH, (C) CON and FUM, and (D) CON and MON. …”
  12. 32
  13. 33
  14. 34
  15. 35

    The significance of variation in cortical bone elastic modulus within sub-regions. by Linje Wang (18064951)

    Published 2024
    “…A <sup>c</sup>Tukey’s post hoc or <sup>d</sup>Dunn’s post hoc test determined the significant difference between slices within a region. …”
  16. 36

    Expression level differences between constructs. by Xinwen Zhu (14709669)

    Published 2023
    “…Two-tailed t-tests determined if the means were statistically different from zero (dashed line), n.s.: not significant, *: p<0.05. …”
  17. 37

    Significant interactions and main effects of day. by Grace Hecker (18813445)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Behaviors that had a significant interaction between day x housing type. …”
  18. 38

    Significant main effect of housing type. by Grace Hecker (18813445)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Behaviors that significantly differed between single- and pair-house dogs. …”
  19. 39

    table1_Significant Regional Differences in Lung Cancer Incidence in Hungary: Epidemiological Study Between 2011 and 2016.docx by Gabriella Gálffy (177759)

    Published 2021
    “…</p><p>Results: The highest incidence rate in males was recorded in Northern Hungary (146.8/100,000 person-years [PY]), while the lowest rate was found in Western Transdanubia (94.7/100,000 PY in 2011). All rates showed a declining trend between 2011 and 2016, with the largest decrease in the Northern Great Plain (−20.0%; p = 0.008). …”
  20. 40

    table4_Significant Regional Differences in Lung Cancer Incidence in Hungary: Epidemiological Study Between 2011 and 2016.docx by Gabriella Gálffy (177759)

    Published 2021
    “…</p><p>Results: The highest incidence rate in males was recorded in Northern Hungary (146.8/100,000 person-years [PY]), while the lowest rate was found in Western Transdanubia (94.7/100,000 PY in 2011). All rates showed a declining trend between 2011 and 2016, with the largest decrease in the Northern Great Plain (−20.0%; p = 0.008). …”