Search alternatives:
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
141
-
142
-
143
Comparison of significant mean shape differences between the techno-structural groups.
Published 2025“…<p>Comparison of significant mean shape differences between the techno-structural groups.…”
-
144
Statistics of GMV differences between groups in the significant lobes (16 areas).
Published 2020“…<p>Statistics of GMV differences between groups in the significant lobes (16 areas).…”
-
145
Pathway analysis with significant differences between infected samples and control samples.
Published 2025“…<p>A comparative analysis using the KEGG pathways database was conducted on leaf (A) and spike (B) samples to identify pathways with significant differences between infected samples and control samples. …”
-
146
-
147
<i>Trcyc8</i> or <i>Trtup1</i> repression resulted in a significant decrease in the transcription of cellulase gene and <i>xyr1</i> transcription.
Published 2021“…Error bars are the SD from these replicates. Significant differences (<i>t</i>-test, *<i>P</i><0.05, **<i>P</i><0.01, ***<i>P</i><0.001) were detected for the transcription of <i>cel7a</i>, <i>cel7b</i>, <i>cel3a</i>, and <i>xyr1</i> between QM9414 and <i>Trcyc8</i><sup>KD</sup> or <i>Trtup1</i> repressed cells.…”
-
148
-
149
-
150
Student’s t-test for significance of differences between uninvaded and invaded plots at different sites.
Published 2021“…<p>Student’s t-test for significance of differences between uninvaded and invaded plots at different sites.…”
-
151
-
152
A summary of the included study characteristics.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
153
-
154
-
155
-
156
-
157
Concentration of RebA and Steviol showed increased significantly, whereas stevioside showed significant decrease in all the transgenic lines.
Published 2023“…<p>Concentration of RebA and Steviol showed increased significantly, whereas stevioside showed significant decrease in all the transgenic lines.…”
-
158
-
159
Differences in acoustic parameters between bat groups.
Published 2019“…(B) Difference in EF (ending frequency, kHz) between approach pulses and buzz pulses calculated as: Approach EF minus buzz EF. …”
-
160