Search alternatives:
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
interaction term » interaction _ (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
interaction term » interaction _ (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
81
-
82
-
83
-
84
-
85
Negative binomial regression with interaction terms.
Published 2023“…<p>Race/ethnicity interactions with sex/gender, age, and education were added to the model, significant interaction terms were shown in the forest plot.…”
-
86
-
87
-
88
-
89
-
90
-
91
-
92
-
93
-
94
Global Land Use Change Impacts on Soil Nitrogen Availability and Environmental Losses
Published 2025“…However, how global land use changes impact soil N supply and potential N loss remains elusive. By compiling a global data set of 1,782 paired observations from 185 publications, we show that land use conversion from natural to managed ecosystems significantly reduced NNM by 7.5% (−11.5, −2.8%) and increased NN by 150% (86, 194%), indicating decreasing N availability while increasing potential N loss through denitrification and nitrate leaching. …”
-
95
-
96
-
97
-
98
The interaction effect of O<sub>3</sub> with age.
Published 2024“…We combine high frequency data on ozone and fine particulate pollution with daily consumer spending in brick-and-mortar retail in 129 postal codes in Spain during 2014 to estimate the association between the two. Using a linear fixed effects model, we find that a 1-standard deviation increase in ozone concentration (20.97 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) is associated with 3.9 percent decrease in consumer spending (95% CI: -0.066, -0.012; p<0.01). …”
-
99
-
100