Showing 1 - 20 results of 85,927 for search '(( significant ((nn decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( significant decrease _ ))', query time: 0.70s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
  2. 2

    Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
  3. 3

    The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified. by Krzysztof Kochanek (835532)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.</p>…”
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17

    Decrease of the mean number of natural teeth and POPs with age. by Sul-Hee Kim (11873853)

    Published 2021
    “…<p>The number of (A) natural teeth and (B) POPs significantly decreased with age in both males and females (<i>P</i> < 0.001). …”
  18. 18
  19. 19

    Synaptopathy at IHC-SGN synapses decreases the peak of the CAP significantly, without changes to peak latency and width. by Maral Budak (6680351)

    Published 2021
    “…The latencies of the CAP peaks did not exhibit any significant difference between different populations for all sound levels.…”
  20. 20