Search alternatives:
significant all » significant anti (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search)
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant all » significant anti (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search)
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Validation of genetic markers for risk of OA or knee OA for decrease in minJSW.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> Manhattan plot of minJSW decrease at 24 months. The Manhattan plots show the -log10(P) values of all ~ 1,5 million SNPs against their position. …”
-
3
The pooled effect of all-cause mortality rate in non-health care workers and health care workers.
Published 2025Subjects: -
4
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
5
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Annual number of outpatient visits in all eyes.
Published 2025“…<p>Mean visit frequency (mean ± standard deviation) significantly decreased from 11.5 ± 4.3 preoperatively to 8.8 ± 4.1, 5.0 ± 3.4, and 4.4 ± 3.2 visits in the first, second, and third postoperative years, respectively (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
Time course of central retinal thickness (CRT) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…<p>In the recurrence group, CRT (μm ± standard deviation) significantly decreased from 546.1 ± 117.0 μm preoperatively to 317.1 ± 46.9, 317.8 ± 55.6, 290.8 ± 33.5, 342.9 ± 82.2, 333.0 ± 84.2, and 349.8 ± 76.9 μm at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
-
20