Showing 1 - 20 results of 34,633 for search '(( significant ((non decrease) OR (nn decrease)) ) OR ( significant attention _ ))', query time: 0.70s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2

    The expectation–attention interaction is significant for MSPCres but not MSPCstim. by Noam Gordon (661276)

    Published 2019
    “…The expectation–attention interaction was not significant for MSPCstim (χ2 = 3.47, <i>P</i> < 0.05) but was highly significant for MSPCres (χ2 = 19.56, <i>P</i> < 0.001). …”
  3. 3
  4. 4

    Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in the N-deficient treatment. by Ranjeeta Adhikari (9905958)

    Published 2023
    “…<p>Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in the N-deficient treatment.…”
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

    Analyses of variance with neuropsychological measures organized by significant attention class differences. by Marisa N. Spann (8763393)

    Published 2020
    “…<p>Analyses of variance with neuropsychological measures organized by significant attention class differences.</p>…”
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11

    Depleted antibody secreting cells did not result in decreased donor specific antibody in non-sensitized animals. by Natalie M. Bath (6316517)

    Published 2022
    “…(A) T (CD3<sup>+</sup>) and (B) B (CD45R<sup>+</sup>) cell flow crossmatch was performed in non-sensitized animals. IgG1<sup>+</sup> in the T cell flow crossmatch was the only DSA that BLyS<sup>-/-</sup> significantly decreased compared to APRIL<sup>-/-</sup> (p<0.03). …”
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16

    Layer attention. by Zheng Ye (15102)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20