Search alternatives:
significant concerns » significant concern (Expand Search), significant constraints (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search)
concerns increases » content increases (Expand Search), confers increased (Expand Search), confers increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant concerns » significant concern (Expand Search), significant constraints (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search)
concerns increases » content increases (Expand Search), confers increased (Expand Search), confers increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
141
Mutation clusters in human tumours with and without association to IR-exposure.
Published 2021Subjects: -
142
-
143
Data for subjects with significant slopes (regional progression or recovery colour coded, non-significant regions white) for the 4 data types over the study period.
Published 2023“…<p>The only diabetic (non-DMO) person with significant thickness changes was mf87171 (row I). …”
-
144
-
145
-
146
Distribution frequency of financial constraints in private and non-private corporations.
Published 2022Subjects: -
147
-
148
-
149
-
150
-
151
-
152
-
153
-
154
-
155
-
156
Time course of central retinal thickness (CRT) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…<p>In the recurrence group, CRT (μm ± standard deviation) significantly decreased from 546.1 ± 117.0 μm preoperatively to 317.1 ± 46.9, 317.8 ± 55.6, 290.8 ± 33.5, 342.9 ± 82.2, 333.0 ± 84.2, and 349.8 ± 76.9 μm at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
-
157
-
158
-
159
-
160