Search alternatives:
significant nmn » significant non (Expand Search), significant new (Expand Search), significant ns (Expand Search)
nmn increases » _ increases (Expand Search), i increases (Expand Search), 1 increases (Expand Search)
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant nmn » significant non (Expand Search), significant new (Expand Search), significant ns (Expand Search)
nmn increases » _ increases (Expand Search), i increases (Expand Search), 1 increases (Expand Search)
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
-
63
-
64
Apparent Non-Newtonian Behavior of Ionic Liquids
Published 2020“…Depending on the liquid and the rheological conditions, both viscosity increase and decrease have been reported. So far, these variations have been interpreted as a signature of a non-Newtonian behavior. …”
-
65
-
66
-
67
-
68
-
69
-
70
-
71
-
72
Annual treatment frequencies in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…<p>In the recurrence group, the respective treatment counts for anti-VEGF, STTA, MA-PC, PPV, and total treatments (mean ± standard deviation) in the year before surgery were 3.0 ± 1.4, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 4.0 ± 2.1, respectively. These significantly decreased to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0.0, and 3.1 ± 2.8 in the first year; 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8 in the second year; and 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 in the third year (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; Dunn’s test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). …”
-
73
-
74
-
75
-
76
-
77
-
78
-
79
-
80