Search alternatives:
significant expected » significant effect (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search), significant aspect (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
increase » increased (Expand Search)
significant expected » significant effect (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search), significant aspect (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
increase » increased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Downregulation of DOM decreases the abundance of PER and TIM.
Published 2019“…Error bars represent ± SEM; n.s., non significant,*<i>P</i> < 0.05,**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA. …”
-
15
-
16
AMPs are increased in lesional HS, but DCD and other sweat-gland associated proteins are decreased.
Published 2019“…Genes represented in orange were unchanged (FC < 2, p-adj < 0.05) in HS lesional vs. HS non-lesional skin. Non-adjusted p-values were used for generation of the volcano plot to minimize points with tied y-values but significance level was set using the corresponding non-adjusted p-values. …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
The expectation–attention interaction is significant for MSPCres but not MSPCstim.
Published 2019“…Consistent with the colours used in the previous figures, attended images are represented by the dark green lines and unattended images by the light green lines, while the pink–red gradient indicates increasing expectation. The significance of the interaction term was tested using the likelihood ratio test between the full model and the reduced model, which excluded the interaction fixed effect. …”
-
20
Layout of plane measurement points at three different heights and the vicinity of the source area.
Published 2024Subjects: