Search alternatives:
significant hits » significant units (Expand Search), significant bias (Expand Search), significant anti (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
hits increase » units increased (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), unit increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
significant hits » significant units (Expand Search), significant bias (Expand Search), significant anti (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
hits increase » units increased (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), unit increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Bootstrapped LIWC negative word ratio (LWNR) around the hit date for each hurricane and location.
Published 2022Subjects: -
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Validation of primary screen hits reveals compounds that recapitulate increased spheroid size (swell) or decreased MUC5AC in the lumen.
Published 2023“…Compounds that appeared to cause toxicity were identified by observing a significant decrease in spheroid counts in the swell readout or a significant decrease in the total nuclear intensity of the MUC5AC ratio readout. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
Downregulation of DOM decreases the abundance of PER and TIM.
Published 2019“…Error bars represent ± SEM; n.s., non significant,*<i>P</i> < 0.05,**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA. …”
-
11
-
12
AMPs are increased in lesional HS, but DCD and other sweat-gland associated proteins are decreased.
Published 2019“…Genes represented in orange were unchanged (FC < 2, p-adj < 0.05) in HS lesional vs. HS non-lesional skin. Non-adjusted p-values were used for generation of the volcano plot to minimize points with tied y-values but significance level was set using the corresponding non-adjusted p-values. …”
-
13
-
14
Layout of plane measurement points at three different heights and the vicinity of the source area.
Published 2024Subjects: -
15
-
16
Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
17
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
18
-
19
-
20