Search alternatives:
significant interventions » significant interactions (Expand Search), significant interaction (Expand Search), significant alterations (Expand Search)
interventions increased » interventions included (Expand Search), interventions based (Expand Search), intervention included (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
significant interventions » significant interactions (Expand Search), significant interaction (Expand Search), significant alterations (Expand Search)
interventions increased » interventions included (Expand Search), interventions based (Expand Search), intervention included (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
-
81
-
82
-
83
Depleted antibody secreting cells did not result in decreased donor specific antibody in non-sensitized animals.
Published 2022“…(A) T (CD3<sup>+</sup>) and (B) B (CD45R<sup>+</sup>) cell flow crossmatch was performed in non-sensitized animals. IgG1<sup>+</sup> in the T cell flow crossmatch was the only DSA that BLyS<sup>-/-</sup> significantly decreased compared to APRIL<sup>-/-</sup> (p<0.03). …”
-
84
-
85
-
86
Does a correlation exist between delayed vaccination and a decreased vaccine confidence?
Published 2024“…Suffering motor/intellectual delay and the obstacles to vaccination process derived from caring for other siblings were associated with delay in second MMR dose. The VCI decreased significantly in first dose group as delay increases but did not change in the second one. …”
-
87
Study characteristics and published significant vs non-significant study findings (<i>n</i> = 522).
Published 2023Subjects: -
88
-
89
-
90
-
91
-
92
Time course of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…In contrast, BCVA in the non-recurrence group significantly improved from 0.31 ± 0.25 preoperatively to 0.25 ± 0.25, 0.23 ± 0.26, 0.23 ± 0.28, 0.21 ± 0.27, 0.20 ± 0.30, and 0.16 ± 0.30 over the same time points (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). …”
-
93
-
94
-
95
-
96
-
97
-
98
-
99
-
100