Search alternatives:
significant different » significantly different (Expand Search), significant difference (Expand Search), significant differences (Expand Search)
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
significant different » significantly different (Expand Search), significant difference (Expand Search), significant differences (Expand Search)
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
3
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
-
4
-
5
-
6
Analysis of Significantly Different Bacteria.
Published 2025“…<p>(A, B) Heatmap and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of significantly different bacteria abundances at various taxonomic levels in all samples: phylum (top), genera (middle), and species (bottom). …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Summary of significance levels for comparison of surgical segment ROM between different test groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
11
-
12
The monoterpene 1,8-cineole decreased parasitemia levels in vitro.
Published 2022“…*<i>P</i> < 0.05 versus control. n.s., not significant.</p>…”
-
13
Deletion of <i>Trgal11</i> resulted in a significant decrease in the transcription of cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase but not β-glucosidase genes.
Published 2020“…Significant differences (t-test, *P<0.05, **P<0.01) were detected for <i>cbh1</i>, <i>eg1</i>, and <i>xyr1</i> gene transcription between QM9414 and Δ<i>Trgal11</i> for the indicated time points after induction. …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20