Search alternatives:
significant difference » significant differences (Expand Search)
difference models » different models (Expand Search), differences model (Expand Search), different modes (Expand Search)
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant difference » significant differences (Expand Search)
difference models » different models (Expand Search), differences model (Expand Search), different modes (Expand Search)
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
121
-
122
-
123
-
124
-
125
-
126
Boruta, random forest model variable significance and ranking for sound pressure levels and anthropogenic noise detections.
Published 2023“…Bars represent the significance (mean Z-score) of each variable from the Boruta wrapper algorithm based on a random forest model. …”
-
127
-
128
-
129
-
130
-
131
-
132
-
133
-
134
Distribution of variation between the ND and NS genotypes across soybean chromosomes.
Published 2022Subjects: -
135
-
136
GCase activity is significantly decreased in the brain and liver of the homozygous <i>GBA1</i> D409V KI mouse model at 4, 8, and 12 months of age.
Published 2021“…In whole brain homogenate (A,C) and liver homogenate (B,D), GCase activity is significantly decreased in the <i>GBA1</i> D409V KI homozygous (HOM) mice as compared to C57Bl/6 wild type (WT) mice (n = 7/group). …”
-
137
-
138
Selected feature clusters of four models and the significant difference test of clinical features.
Published 2020“…<p>Selected feature clusters of four models and the significant difference test of clinical features.…”
-
139
The significant difference between DGNN-DDI and other models in terms of predicted scores.
Published 2023“…<p>The significant difference between DGNN-DDI and other models in terms of predicted scores.…”
-
140